An example of how the government ignore the suggestions made by the BBC is the EU Referendum Debate, which was easily defeated on the floor of the House despite having a sizeable Tory rebellion.
The reasoning behind this is that the government maintains the power to ignore the reports presented to them by Select Committees. This over-seeing and examination of executive work provides effective and detailed scrutiny. An example of backbench rebellion against the party line is in when the government were defeated on the EU Budget Debate because 53 Conservative backbenchers rebelled against the party line and preferred a cut.
Whilst working on Select Committees, backbenchers check and report on areas ranging from the work of government departments to economic affairs. Some backbencher MPs are largely ineffective in that they are sometimes unwilling to contribute their ideas, plans for policies and bills due to fear of how they will be received by the higher status politicians in Parliament.
Evidently, there is a mixture in the extent of effectiveness among backbenchers, but the majority are largely effective when it comes to their expected function, scrutiny.
A key function of Backbencher MPs is that they scrutinise the proposed work of the PM, the ministers in charge of the departmental committees and fellow Backbenchers. On the other hand, some may argue that in recent years particularly, backbenchers have been a lot more active, as their role has evolved over time and has gained more credibility in the political world due to the recent backbencher achievements.
This ultimately undermines the effectiveness of committees because although they provide sufficient scrutiny, the government is not legally bound to implement any changes suggested to them. Following intense scrutiny from the Treasury Select Committee led by Andrew Tyrie, Osborne scrapped the plans in a victory for backbench pressure.
A process that involves close inspection of specific legislation and, where it is seen necessary, amendments may be proposed. Overall, these government victories in Parliament show that the government majority controlled by party whips still maintain lots of control over backbenchers.
Whilst working on Select Committees, backbenchers check and report on areas ranging from the work of government departments to economic affairs. Another factor that makes a lot of backbenchers ineffective in terms of scrutiny is that many avoid challenging the more high-status members of Parliament due to their fear that if they were to do so it may harm the growth of their political career, and chances of promotion.
Backbenchers introducing private members bills are also constrained by lack of time. Despite their ability to rebel, backbench MPs are still controlled by party whips which is shown via the fact that the government has won the vote on all major legislation.
Conservative backbenchers withdrew support and the initiative had to be dropped, when the Lords Reform was raised within Parliament. This over-seeing and examination of executive work provides effective and detailed scrutiny.
The current Coalition government means that there is a reduced majority in the government which, as a result, has increased the effectiveness of backbenchers. The current Coalition government means that there is a reduced majority in the government which, as a result, has increased the effectiveness of backbenchers.
The executive is solely in control over private members bill and very few will ever pass unless they support it at which point it ceases to be a private members bill in all but official title. With Parliament being sovereign and therefore the supreme law making authority, backbenchers are less pressured to toe the party line, and as a result are more able to carry out constituency duties.
However, it should be stressed that in the last decade more and more female MPs and MPs from minority ethnic groups have become backbencher MPs, growing as a representative body and therefore becoming more effective.
For example, Tom Watson, in his first year of being an MP for Labour inlaunched a campaign to ban album sales of convicted sex offender Gary Glitter, proving that backbenchers are effective.
The rebellions rarely exceed a dozen of the most radical Tory MPS, and the governments working majority of over 70 means they are rarely effective at forming a resistance to the power of the executive.
The actual effectiveness of backbenchers depends mainly on the state of the current government, including factors like size. There are still weaknesses to their roles, but overall there is definitely a recent increase in the effectiveness of backbenchers in the UK.
This retraction of the proposal shows a victory for backbench pressure, and it conveys how the scrutiny can improve the government in the interest of larger society — thus proving the effectiveness of backbenchers.
Indeed, it is important to highlight that not all backbenchers are afraid of putting out their ideas for new legislation. In this Parliament, the government were defeated on the EU Budget Debate in because 53 Conservative backbenchers rebelled against the proposed freeze in the EU Budget, preferring a cut.
Schemes like scrapping the spare-bedroom subsidy, welfare caps, cuts to legal aid and reductions in policing numbers all add up to sweeping public sector cuts that have become very unpopular. The rebellions rarely exceed a dozen of the most radical Tory MPS, and the governments working majority of over 70 means they are rarely effective at forming a resistance to the power of the executive.
‘How effective are backbench MPs?’ 40 marks Backbench MPs are critical for UK democracy. They allow for high standard scrutiny of the government which holds them accountable for their actions to the people. They help in representing the electorate. How effective are backbencher MPs?
Essay. A backbencher is an MP who does not hold governmental office, and is not a frontbencher spokesperson in the opposition - How effective are backbencher MPs? Essay introduction. There is no said test of backbench MP efficiency, however we can come up with a measure of their effectiveness by looking at how effective they are within their role.
Backbench Mps are highly effective within the British Political system, as they‘re able to scrutinize government actions and hold them to account in numerous ways.
Backbench Mps are highly effective within the British Political system, as they‘re able to scrutinize government actions and hold them to account in numerous ways. Their role in Parliament in westminster ensures the democratic legitimacy of UK government and gives the government authority and a right to exercise political power.
In conclusion, due to the fact that backbench MPs suggestions/motions can be ignored by government, the pressure to ‘toe-the-party-line’ from party whips and the lack of representation, it can be argued that backbench MPs are not effective.How effective are backbench mps